Foundations and Trends® in Accounting > Vol 17 > Issue 1

Timeliness, Accuracy, and Relevance in Dynamic Incentive Contracts

By Peter O. Christensen | Gerald A. Feltham | Christian Hofmann, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany, Ch.Hofmann@lmu.de | Florin Sabac, University of Alberta, Canada, fsabac@ualberta.ca

 
Suggested Citation
Peter O. Christensen, Gerald A. Feltham, Christian Hofmann and Florin Sabac (2022), "Timeliness, Accuracy, and Relevance in Dynamic Incentive Contracts", Foundations and Trends® in Accounting: Vol. 17: No. 1, pp 1-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1400000063

Publication Date: 31 Oct 2022
© 2022 P. O. Christensen et al.
 
Subjects
Management control,  Performance measurement,  Corporate finance,  Economic Theory,  Principal-agent
 

Free Preview:

Download extract

Share

Download article
In this article:
1. Introduction
2. Actions, Reporting, and Compensation
3. Agent Preferences and Choices
4. Principal’s Problem Under Full Commitment
5. Equivalent Representations and Independence
6. Timing of Reports with Full Commitment
7. Timing of Reports with Limited Commitment
8. Concluding Remarks
Appendix
Acknowledgements
References

Abstract

We examine managerial performance measures from the perspective of timeliness, accuracy, and relevance in multi-period incentive problems. Although many insights are general, we employ a simple linear framework where managerial actions do not affect risk. We compare and contrast consumption risk for a manager’s preferences with single and multiple consumption dates, respectively. We consider both full commitment to and renegotiation of long-term contracts. Under full commitment, timely and accurate information is usually relevant and desirable; the only differences arise from the modeling of managerial preferences, through the manager’s consumption risk. In particular, the timeliness of performance reports can be irrelevant; then, delaying reports is desirable if it can increase their accuracy.

Under renegotiation of long-term contracts, the timeliness of information release relative to renegotiation is essential. Any information released prior to renegotiation is incorporated into an ex post efficient (renegotiated) contract and is particularly useful in insuring the manager against future consumption risk. Delayed reporting destroys this insurance value and can make late reports irrelevant, independent of the modeling of managerial preferences. But timely reports can create ex ante inefficient action incentives for managers, and then accuracy can be costly as well.

DOI:10.1561/1400000063
ISBN: 978-1-63828-084-2
92 pp. $70.00
Buy book (pb)
 
ISBN: 978-1-63828-085-9
92 pp. $145.00
Buy E-book (.pdf)
Table of contents:
1. Introduction
2. Actions, Reporting, and Compensation
3. Agent Preferences and Choices
4. Principal’s Problem Under Full Commitment
5. Equivalent Representations and Independence
6. Timing of Reports with Full Commitment
7. Timing of Reports with Limited Commitment
8. Concluding Remarks
Appendix
Acknowledgements
References

Timeliness, Accuracy, and Relevance in Dynamic Incentive Contracts

Timeliness, Accuracy, and Relevance in Dynamic Incentive Contracts examines managerial performance measures from the perspective of timeliness, accuracy, and relevance in multi-period incentive problems. The authors use a simple linear framework where managerial actions do not affect risk and compare and contrast consumption risk for a manager’s preferences with single and multiple consumption dates, respectively.

Both full commitment to and renegotiation of long-term contracts are considered. Under full commitment, timely and accurate information is usually relevant and desirable; the only differences arise from the modeling of managerial preferences, through the manager’s consumption risk. In particular, the timeliness of performance reports can be irrelevant; then, delaying reports is desirable if it can increase their accuracy. Under renegotiation of long-term contracts, the timeliness of information release relative to renegotiation is essential. Any information released prior to renegotiation is incorporated into an ex post efficient (renegotiated) contract and is particularly useful in insuring the manager against future consumption risk. Delayed reporting destroys this insurance value and can make late reports irrelevant, independent of the modeling of managerial preferences. But timely reports can create ex ante inefficient action incentives for managers, and then accuracy can be costly as well.

 
ACC-063