Critical Finance Review > Vol 11 > Issue 3-4

The Jobs Act Did Not Raise IPO Underpricing

Even-Tov Omri, Haas School of Business, U.C. Berkeley, USA, omri_eventov@berkeley.edu , N. Patatoukas Panos, Haas School of Business, U.C. Berkeley, USA, panos.patatoukas@berkeley.edu , S. Yoon Young, Haas School of Business, U.C. Berkeley, USA, y.s.yoon@berkeley.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Even-Tov Omri, N. Patatoukas Panos and S. Yoon Young (2022), "The Jobs Act Did Not Raise IPO Underpricing", Critical Finance Review: Vol. 11: No. 3-4, pp 431-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000117

Publication Date: 10 Aug 2022
© 2022 Even-Tov Omri, N. Patatoukas Panos and S. Yoon Young
 
Subjects
 
Keywords
G20G24G38K22
JOBS ActEmerging growth companiesIPO pricing
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
1. Background 
2. Research Design and Data 
3. Empirical Results 
4. Conclusion 
Appendices 
References 

Abstract

While the intended goal of the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act was to ease access to capital for emerging growth companies (EGCs), prior studies, notably Barth et al. (2017), find evidence of an increase in initial public offering (IPO) underpricing and a higher cost of equity capital for EGC issuers. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that changes in overall IPO market conditions explain the seeming increase in IPO underpricing. In fact, EGC issuers that take advantage of the accounting disclosure relief afforded by the Act raise capital at higher pre-IPO multiples. These reduced-accounting disclosure EGCs have more speculative valuation profiles and lower institutional ownership and are more likely to destroy long-term shareholder value in the IPO aftermarket. Overall, our paper offers an alternative perspective on the effect of the JOBS Act on IPO pricing.

DOI:10.1561/104.00000117