Journal of Historical Political Economy > Vol 5 > Issue 3-4

The Origins and Development of Federal Flood Control Policy

Jeffery A. Jenkins, Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, USA, jenkinja@usc.edu , Thomas R. Gray, School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, USA, thomas.gray1@utdallas.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Jeffery A. Jenkins and Thomas R. Gray (2025), "The Origins and Development of Federal Flood Control Policy", Journal of Historical Political Economy: Vol. 5: No. 3-4, pp 431-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/115.00000103

Publication Date: 09 Dec 2025
© 2025 J. A. Jenkins and T. R. Gray
 
Subjects
Congress,  Intergovernmental relations,  Law,  Water
 
Keywords
Flood controllevee constructionfederal policyCongress
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
Background 
The Newlands Inland Waterways Commission 
The Flood Control Act of 1917 
The Flood Control Act of 1928 
The Flood Control Act of 1936 
Multivariate Analysis 
Conclusion 
References 

Abstract

We explore the path from ad hoc federal flood control policy in the mid-1850s to flood control becoming a clear federal responsibility in 1936. Federal flood control was done in a piecemeal way through the early-twentieth century before three "landmark laws" over a two-decade period created a clear federal flood control policy. The Flood Control Act of 1917 was the beginning of modern flood control policy, as Congress approved federal aid for levee construction across the lower Mississippi River and parts of California in response to massive flooding. The Flood Control Act of 1928 represented the evolution of federal flood control policy, as a levees-only policy was abandoned and a comprehensive flood control program — where spillways, floodways, storage basins, and reservoirs were components along with levees — was adopted following the Great Mississippi River Flood of 1927. Finally, the Flood Control Act of 1936 made clear, during a period of extensive growth in the size and perceived responsibilities of the federal government, that flood control was a proper federal responsibility in keeping with promoting the general welfare of the country as a whole — and thus established a national policy on flood control. In accompanying multivariate analyses, we find that more liberal members of Congress were increasingly inclined to support flood control legislation — irrespective of party. We also find that members representing states/districts along the Mississippi River were also more inclined (controlling for all other factors) to support early legislation, but this regional effect disappeared as flood control appropriations covered a wider geographic area.

DOI:10.1561/115.00000103

Companion

Journal of Historical Political Economy, Volume 5, Issue 3-4 Special Issue: The Historical Political Economy of Water
See the other articles that are part of this special issue.