International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics > Vol 4 > Issue 1

Combining Policies for Renewable Energy: Is the Whole Less Than the Sum of Its Parts?

Carolyn Fischer, Resources for the Future (RFF), Louis Preonas, Resources for the Future (RFF)
Suggested Citation
Carolyn Fischer and Louis Preonas (2010), "Combining Policies for Renewable Energy: Is the Whole Less Than the Sum of Its Parts?", International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics: Vol. 4: No. 1, pp 51-92.

Publication Date: 22 Jun 2010
© 2010 C. Fischer and L. Preonas
Environmental Economics
EnvironmentTechnologyExternalityPolicyClimateChangeRenewable energy


Download article
In this article:
1 Introduction 
2 Policies and Rationales for Promoting Generation from Renewable Sources 
3 Comparing Policies 
4 The Incidence of Overlapping Policies 
5 Rationales for Overlapping Policies 
6 Choosing Instruments for Renewable Energy: Conclusions and Directions for Research 
List of Abbreviations 


Since the energy crisis in the 1970s and later the growing concern for climate change in the 1990s, policymakers at all levels of government and around the world have been enthusiastically supporting a wide range of incentive mechanisms for electricity from renewable energy sources (RES-E). Motivations range from energy security to environmental preservation to green jobs and innovation, and measures comprise an array of subsidies to mandates to emissions trading. But do these policies work together or at cross-purposes? To evaluate RES-E policies, one must understand how specific policy mechanisms interact with each other and under what conditions multiple policy levers are necessary. In this article, we review the recent environmental economics literature on the effectiveness of RES-E policies and the interactions between them, with a focus on the increasing use of tradable quotas for both emissions reduction and RES-E expansion.