International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics > Vol 15 > Issue 1-2

Policies as Information Carriers: How Environmental Policies May Change Beliefs and Consequent Behavior

Ann-Kathrin Koessler, Alexander von Humboldt-Professorship of Environmental Economics, Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrueck, Germany, akoessler@uos.de , Stefanie Engel, Alexander von Humboldt-Professorship of Environmental Economics, Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrueck, Germany, stefanie.engel@uos.de
 
Suggested Citation
Ann-Kathrin Koessler and Stefanie Engel (2021), "Policies as Information Carriers: How Environmental Policies May Change Beliefs and Consequent Behavior", International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics: Vol. 15: No. 1-2, pp 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/101.00000123

Publication Date: 28 Jul 2021
© 2021 A.-K. Koessler and S. Engel
 
Subjects
Environmental economics,  Environmental politics,  Law and economics,  Public economics,  Behavioral Decision Making,  Individual Decision Making,  Public policy
 
Keywords
JEL Codes: D01D80D90H23Q58
Environmental policiespolicy interventionbeliefsbehavioral economics
 

Share

Open Access

This is published under the terms of CC-BY.

In this article:
1 Introduction 
2 Conventional Ways to Influence Behavior with Environmental Policy 
3 Relevant Belief Domains 
4 Conclusion 
References 

Abstract

This paper discusses how policy interventions not only alter the legal and financial frameworks in which an individual is operating, but can also lead to changes in relevant beliefs. We argue that such belief changes in how an individual perceives herself, relevant others, the regulator and/or the activity in question can lead to behavioral changes that were neither intended nor expected when the policy was designed.

In the environmental economics literature, these secondary impacts of conventional policy interventions have not been systematically reviewed. Hence, we intend to raise awareness of these effects. In this paper, we review relevant research from behavioral economics and psychology, and identify and discuss the domains for which beliefs can change. Lastly, we discuss design options with which an undesired change in beliefs can be avoided when a new policy is put into practice.

DOI:10.1561/101.00000123