Journal of Forest Economics > Vol 35 > Issue 2-3

Public Expenditure Effectiveness for Biodiversity Conservation: Understanding the Trends for Project Tiger in India

Bibhu P. Nayak, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, India, bibhuprasadnayak@gmail.com Pradyot Ranjan Jena, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, India, Saswata Chaudhury, The Energy and Resources Institute, India,
 
Suggested Citation
Bibhu P. Nayak, Pradyot Ranjan Jena and Saswata Chaudhury (2020), "Public Expenditure Effectiveness for Biodiversity Conservation: Understanding the Trends for Project Tiger in India", Journal of Forest Economics: Vol. 35: No. 2-3, pp 229-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000512

Publication Date: 30 Mar 2020
© 2020 B. P. Nayak and P. R. Jena and S. Chaudhury
 
Subjects
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
1. Introduction
2. Effectiveness of Conservation Expenditure: A Review
3. Government Expenditure for Tiger Conservation in India
4. Tiger Conservation Outcomes
5. Expenditure and Conservation Outcomes
6. Findings and Discussion
7. Conclusion
References

Abstract

Project Tiger, a flagship programme for conservation of the tiger launched in 1973 in India has expanded over the years in terms of its geographical coverage and volume of expenditure. However, the tiger is still an endangered species in India and conservation efforts face multiple challenges like widespread loss of tiger habitat, decline in the density of prey animals, illegal poaching, humananimal conflicts and revenge killing. This study explores the trends and patterns of government expenditure over the years by reviewing the annual plan of operation of different tiger reserves and examines whether the volume or the pattern of expenditure has any relationship with performance, measured by the change in the number of tigers and occupancy in 28 tiger reserves. Analysis of the financial outlay data in the Annual Plan of Operation of the tiger reserves suggest that habitat improvement, which includes relocation, gets the highest share whereas humananimal conflict and eco-development gets the least, though more than 0.5 million households are located in and around the tiger reserves 0.3 million. Allocations are neither proportional to the size of the reserve nor to the tiger population. The relationships between expenditure categories and tiger populations are explored through a negative binomial regression model. Among the expenditure categories, expenditure on habitat improvement, excluding relocation, is found to be negatively related to tiger population whereas all other expenditures like infrastructure, protection, and human-animal conflict are positively related.

DOI:10.1561/112.00000512

Companion

Journal of Forest Economics, Volume 35, Issue 2-3 Special issue - Natural capital and ecosystem service: Sustainable forest management and climate change: Articles Overiew
See the other articles that are part of this special issue.