Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy > Vol 5 > Issue 4

Pro-Carbon Policymaking in Renewable Portfolio Standards: An Empirical Assessment

Srinivas C. Parinandi, Department of Political Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA, srinivas.parinandi@colorado.edu , Sara Hoose, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA, sara.hoose@colorado.edu , Hyodong Sohn, Department of Political Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA, hyodong.sohn@colorado.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Srinivas C. Parinandi, Sara Hoose and Hyodong Sohn (2024), "Pro-Carbon Policymaking in Renewable Portfolio Standards: An Empirical Assessment", Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy: Vol. 5: No. 4, pp 659-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/113.00000114

Publication Date: 30 Dec 2024
© 2024 S. C. Parinandi, S. Hoose, and H. Sohn
 
Subjects
Law and economics,  Carbon regulation,  Environmental politics,  Political economy,  Public policy
 
Keywords
Renewable energyfederalismpolitical economypro-carbon policymakinginterest groups
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
Extant Research on RPS Policy Adoption 
Identifying Pro-Carbon Policymaking and Constructing the Adoption Dataset 
Possible Theoretical Motives and Empirical Results 
Results 
Conclusion 
References 

Abstract

Here, we develop and deploy a procedure to identify pro-carbon policymaking in state renewable portfolio standard (RPS) policy from 1983–2011. We then evaluate a battery of plausible theoretical explanations that could account for state-level adoption of pro-carbon RPS policy. We ultimately find substantial support linking pro-carbon RPS policy adoption to states with high coal production doing so proactively in order to protect that industry in the face of possible Obama administration electricity policy action; and we find possible (though less robust) support for the same explanation with respect to states with high natural gas production. One implication of our findings is that states might utilize policymaking to protect component industries of their electricity sectors given Biden administration electricity policymaking, and another implication is that states might utilize the same process to protect non-fossil fuel-based sources of carbon emissions.

DOI:10.1561/113.00000114

Companion

Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, Volume 5, Issue 4 Special Issue: The Political Economy of Energy: Articles Overiew
See the other articles that are part of this special issue.