Quarterly Journal of Political Science > Vol 15 > Issue 2

Defending Sober Voters against Sensationalist Scholars: A Reply to Rogers

Anthony Fowler, Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, USA, anthony.fowler@uchicago.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Anthony Fowler (2020), "Defending Sober Voters against Sensationalist Scholars: A Reply to Rogers", Quarterly Journal of Political Science: Vol. 15: No. 2, pp 213-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00018027b

Publication Date: 09 Apr 2020
© 2020 A. Fowler
 
Subjects
Elections,  Democracy,  Electoral behavior,  Political parties,  Political psychology
 

Share

Journal details

Download article
In this article:
New Coke 
Direct vs. Indirect Effects of Party 
Can We Disentangle Party and Policy Using Panel Data? 
State Partisanship in Presidential Elections 
Controlling for Challenger Quality 
Candidate Characteristics Matter 
Concluding Thoughts 
References 

Abstract

DOI:10.1561/100.00018027b

Related publications

Commentary Article

Sobering up after "Partisan Intoxication or Policy Voting?" , Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Volume 15, Issue 2 10.1561/100.00019039

Companion

Partisan Intoxication or Policy Voting? , Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Volume 15, Issue 2 10.1561/100.00018027a