Review of Behavioral Economics > Vol 11 > Issue 4

Exploring the Process of Decision Making on the Use of Pensions for Financing Old Age: Muslim Workers Living in England

Alija Avdukic, Political Economy and Islamic Finance, University of Dundee School of Business, UK, aavdukic001@dundee.ac.uk , Faizal Monjoo, Islamic Studies and Finance, Markfield Institute of Higher Education (MIHE), UK, faizal.manjoo@mihe.ac.uk , Ataollah Rahmani, Islamic Commercial Law, Al-Maktoum College of Higher Education and School of Business University of Dundee, UK, a.rahmani@almcollege.ac.uk , Ahmed Abdullah, Statistics and Research Design Specialist, Abertay University, UK, a.abdullah@abertay.ac.uk
 
Suggested Citation
Alija Avdukic, Faizal Monjoo, Ataollah Rahmani and Ahmed Abdullah (2024), "Exploring the Process of Decision Making on the Use of Pensions for Financing Old Age: Muslim Workers Living in England", Review of Behavioral Economics: Vol. 11: No. 4, pp 471-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000197

Publication Date: 16 Oct 2024
© 2024 A. Avdukic, F. Monjoo, A. Rahmani and A. Abdullah
 
Subjects
Behavioral economics,  Bounded rationality
 
Keywords
JEL Codes: D14, E43, J14, J15, J30, M50, Z12, Z13
Religio-economic behaviourIslamic pensionold age protection
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
Methodology and Hypothesis Development 
Empirical Model Selection and Estimation Method 
Research Results 
Discussion: Influence of Religious Values over Pension Subscription 
Conclusion 
References 

Abstract

This study explores the role of religion in decision-making of the Muslim working communities for the use of interest-bearing pensions. In the absence of any theoretical framework on this topic, the paper explores the multiple socioeconomic factors that may influence the attitude, perception, motivation, and action of Muslim workers towards joining pension schemes for old age protection, by proposing the Muslim Workers’ Acceptance of Pension Model. The paper takes an exploratory `community-based participatory research’ (CBPR) methodology with an interpretivist approach in line with the social constructivist paradigm. It contributes to the broader debate on the effect of cultural, religious, and social values of marginalised communities on the inclusion and widening access for old age protection. It also provides insight into the factors and reasons of divergence from the available pension models. The findings emphasise that people sharing the same location do not necessarily share the same level of opportunities due to the intersectionality of race, religion, gender, and class.

DOI:10.1561/105.00000197

Online Appendix | 105.00000197_app.pdf

This is the article's accompanying appendix.

DOI: 10.1561/105.00000197_app