Review of Corporate Finance > Vol 1 > Issue 3-4

Equity Crowdfunding: New Evidence from US and UK Markets

Alice Rossi, Department of Management, University of Bergamo, Italy, alice.rossi@unibg.it , Tom Vanacker, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium and University of Exeter Business School, UK, t.vanacker@exeter.ac.uk , Silvio Vismara, Department of Management, University of Bergamo, Italy, silvio.vismara@unibg.it
 
Suggested Citation
Alice Rossi, Tom Vanacker and Silvio Vismara (2021), "Equity Crowdfunding: New Evidence from US and UK Markets", Review of Corporate Finance: Vol. 1: No. 3-4, pp 407-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/114.00000009

Publication Date: 13 Jul 2021
© 2021 A. Rossi, T. Vanacker and S. Vismara
 
Subjects
Corporate finance,  New business financing
 
Keywords
G23G24L26M13
Equity crowdfundingentrepreneurial financeUSnew venturesstartup financing
 

Share

Login to download a free copy
In this article:
1. Introduction 
2. Institutional Background 
3. Sample and Methods 
4. Results 
5. Conclusions 
Appendix 
References 

Abstract

This paper offers insights into 3,576 initial equity crowdfunding offerings in the UK and US markets from 2012 to 2019. We investigate the factors influencing three outcomes: the success of the offering, the fundraising target, and matching between entrepreneurial ventures and crowdfunding platforms. In all markets, higher equity retention by original entrepreneurs positively affects the chances of success of the offerings and amount of capital raised. However, there are differences across platforms. Patents do not have a significant impact in entrepreneur-led platforms, while they matter in the UK investor-led platform SyndicateRoom. By separately observing the capital demand set by entrepreneurs and the capital supply by investors, we find that entrepreneurs in financial centers set higher targets in UK markets. There is no difference in the amount of capital raised by female and male entrepreneurs, conditional on female founders setting lower targets in UK markets.

DOI:10.1561/114.00000009