Strategic Behavior and the Environment > Vol 9 > Issue 1-2

Transboundary Externalities and Reciprocal Taxes: A Differential Game Approach

Charles F. Mason, Department of Economics, University of Wyoming, USA, bambuzlr@uwyo.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Charles F. Mason (2021), "Transboundary Externalities and Reciprocal Taxes: A Differential Game Approach", Strategic Behavior and the Environment: Vol. 9: No. 1-2, pp 27-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/102.00000100

Publication Date: 19 Jul 2021
© 2021 C. F. Mason
 
Subjects
Environmental Economics,  Environmental Economics:Climate Change,  Public Economics:Environmental Taxation,  Economic Theory:Game Theory,  International relations:International conflict,  Game theory,  Climate Change
 
Keywords
JEL Codes: C73Q50F18
Transboundary pollutiondifferential gametarifftax
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
Modeling Preliminaries 
Baseline Solutions 
The Socially Optimal Solution 
The Non-cooperative Equilibrium 
Concluding Remarks 
Appendix A. Derivations in the Linear-Quadratic Model 
References 

Abstract

I investigate the interaction between a country that imports a commodity whose production contributes to a stock pollution from a country that produces that commodity. If the transboundary externality is priced improperly, the application of a tariff or border tax adjustment can provide an indirect policy instrument. But the imposition of such a tariff or tax creates an incentive for the producing country to deploy a domestic pollution tax. This, in turn, creates a strategic interaction between the two countries. Because the externality is linked to a stock pollutant, this strategic interaction will play out over time, which induces a dynamic game. In this modeling context, I describe the nature of the strategic interaction, and characterize the Markov-perfect equilibrium (MPE). Numerical results indicate that MPE can deliver long-run welfare levels similar to the social optimum program, and that the exporting country may be better off in the MPE than in the "business-as-usual" regime.

DOI:10.1561/102.00000100