Strategic Behavior and the Environment > Vol 10 > Issue 1-2

The Green Paradox and Learning by Doing

Rögnvaldur Hannesson, Norwegian School of Economics, Norway, Rognvaldur.Hannesson@nhh.no
 
Suggested Citation
Rögnvaldur Hannesson (2024), "The Green Paradox and Learning by Doing", Strategic Behavior and the Environment: Vol. 10: No. 1-2, pp 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/102.00000105

Publication Date: 18 Nov 2024
© 2024 R. Hannesson
 
Subjects
Renewables integration,  Environmental economics,  Climate change,  Formal modelling,  Knowledge, innovation, and technology
 
Keywords
JEL Codes: Q31Q35Q41Q42Q43Q48
Green paradoxrenewable integrationclimate changeresource extractionbackstop technology
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
A Model of Learning by Doing 
Competitive Markets 
Monopoly 
Conclusion 
References 

Abstract

Production of a renewable substitute to fossil fuels is modeled as causing the cost of this backstop technology to fall over time in proportion to the scale of the substitute production and how long it has been in use. The unit cost of resource extraction is assumed to rise as the stock is depleted, so learning by doing will increase the reserves permanently left in the ground. The green paradox can nevertheless be present, in the sense that the resource extraction path can initially lie above what it would be in the absence of a parallel production of renewable energy. In a monopolistic market, the resource monopolist's optimal price path is two-phased, even with inelastic demand. In the limit-pricing phase, the price is falling, due to the progressive learning by doing effect, and the extraction path is rising.

DOI:10.1561/102.00000105