APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing > Vol 13 > Issue 1

On the Accuracy of Phase Extraction from a Known-Frequency Noisy Sinusoidal Signal

Emmanuel Dervieux, Biosency, France AND University of Strasbourg, France AND CNRS, France, emmanuel.dervieux@biosency.com , Florian Tilquin, Biosency, France, Alexis Bisiaux, Biosency, France, Wilfried Uhring, University of Strasbourg, France AND CNRS, France
 
Suggested Citation
Emmanuel Dervieux, Florian Tilquin, Alexis Bisiaux and Wilfried Uhring (2024), "On the Accuracy of Phase Extraction from a Known-Frequency Noisy Sinusoidal Signal", APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing: Vol. 13: No. 1, e35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/116.20240042

Publication Date: 10 Dec 2024
© 2024 E. Dervieux, F. Tilquin, B. Alexis and W. Uhring
 
Subjects
Detection and estimation,  Signal processing for communications,  Sensors,  Sampling,  Statistical signal processing
 
Keywords
Spectral estimationphase estimationsynchronous samplingFourier analysis
 

Share

Open Access

This is published under the terms of CC BY-NC.

Downloaded: 33 times

In this article:
Introduction 
Problem Formulation 
Characterisation of the DFT Distribution 
Phase Estimation from the DFT 
Asymptotical Behaviours of the RMSE 
Conclusion 
References 

Abstract

Accurate phase extraction from sinusoidal signals is a crucial task in various signal processing applications. While prior research predominantly addresses the case of asynchronous sampling with unknown signal frequency, this study focuses on the more specific situation where synchronous sampling is possible, and the signal’s frequency is known. In this framework, a comprehensive analysis of phase estimation accuracy in the presence of both additive and phase noises is presented. A closed-form expression for the asymptotic Probability Density Function (PDF) of the resulting phase estimator is validated by simulations depicting Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) trends in different noise scenarios. This estimator is asymptotically efficient, converging rapidly to its Cramèr-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB). Three distinct RMSE behaviours were identified based on SNR, sample count (N), and noise level: (i) saturation towards a random guess at low Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), (ii) linear decrease with the square roots of N and SNR at moderate noise levels, and (iii) saturation at high SNR towards a noise floor dependent on the phase noise level. By quantifying the impact of sample count, additive noise, and phase noise on phase estimation accuracy, this work provides valuable insights for designing systems requiring precise phase extraction, such as phase-based fluorescence assays or system identification.

DOI:10.1561/116.20240042