Annals of Corporate Governance > Vol 8 > Issue 4

Diversity in the Boardroom: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature

By Sara De Masi, University of Florence, Italy, sara.demasi@unifi.it | Alessandro Zattoni, Luiss University, Italy, azattoni@luiss.it | Stergios Leventis, International Hellenic University, Greece, s.leventis@ihu.edu.gr | Hans van Ees, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, h.van.ees@rug.nl

 
Suggested Citation
Sara De Masi, Alessandro Zattoni, Stergios Leventis and Hans van Ees (2025), "Diversity in the Boardroom: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature", Annals of Corporate Governance: Vol. 8: No. 4, pp 250-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/109.00000042

Publication Date: 09 Apr 2025
© 2025 S. De Masi et al.
 
Subjects
Corporate governance,  Leadership and governance,  Organization and strategy,  Gender and ethnicity
 

Free Preview:

Download extract

Share

Download article
In this article:
1. Introduction
2. From Group to Board Diversity
3. Governance Studies on Board Diversity
4. Methods to Investigate Board Diversity
5. The Antecedents of Board Diversity
6. Board Diversity as an Intermediate Variable
7. Consequences of Board Diversity on Firm and Board Outcomes
8. Future Research Directions
9. Conclusion
References

Abstract

After several decades of male Caucasian dominance, the composition of boards of directors has recently changed. Various factors, such as social pressure, the evolution of corporate law and good governance codes, have contributed to increase board (mostly, but not only) gender diversity. The growing prevalence of more diverse boards and the availability of data on directors’ demographics encouraged corporate governance scholars to investigate the antecedents and the consequences of board diversity. Early studies developed around the idea that directors’ diversity increases board experiences and perspectives, and so positively influences board effectiveness and corporate outcomes. The empirical evidence collected on board diversity’s impact on board and company results shows, however, only partial or mixed findings. Thus, the goal of this systematic and interdisciplinary literature review on board diversity is to understand the characteristics of previous studies and to summarize their main results. Our analysis identifies existing gaps, presents major theoretical and methodological barriers, and highlights future avenues to further advance research on board diversity.

DOI:10.1561/109.00000042
ISBN: 978-1-63828-522-9
108 pp. $75.00
Buy book (pb)
 
ISBN: 978-1-63828-523-6
108 pp. $160.00
Buy E-book (.pdf)
Table of contents:
1. Introduction
2. From Group to Board Diversity
3. Governance Studies on Board Diversity
4. Methods to Investigate Board Diversity
5. The Antecedents of Board Diversity
6. Board Diversity as an Intermediate Variable
7. Consequences of Board Diversity on Firm and Board Outcomes
8. Future Research Directions
9. Conclusion
References

Diversity in the Boardroom: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature

Diversity in the Boardroom: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature provides reflections on the drivers and the consequences of more diverse boards. This work examines the meaning of “diversity”, the methods and measures used to operationalize it, the drivers promoting it, its main consequences on board and firm outcomes, and the relationships it moderates.

This systematic and interdisciplinary literature review synthesizes the most relevant studies on board diversity, highlighting major results and research gaps. Following the structured approach of previous literature reviews, the authors select empirical studies on board diversity published in accounting, business, finance, management, and organization journals. This interdisciplinary review makes three contributions to the literature on board diversity. First, it suggests multiple ways to enhance and expand the theoretical frameworks. Second, it identifies key methodological issues and proposes solutions to address them. Finally, it highlights several concerns regarding the operationalization of the diversity variable and outlines methods to resolve them.

 
ACG-042