Strategic Management Review > Vol 6 > Issue 1-2

The Antecedents and Consequences of Multi-Firm Technology Coordination: An Ecosystem Perspective

Ram Ranganathan, University of Texas at Austin, USA, rr36883@eid.utexas.edu , John Chen, Baylor University, USA, John_Chen@baylor.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Ram Ranganathan and John Chen (2025), "The Antecedents and Consequences of Multi-Firm Technology Coordination: An Ecosystem Perspective", Strategic Management Review: Vol. 6: No. 1-2, pp 75-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/111.00000075

Publication Date: 19 Mar 2025
© 2025 now Publishers, Inc.
 
Subjects
Strategic alliances and networks,  Strategic management,  Competitive strategy,  Collaborative strategy,  Knowledge, innovation, and technology,  Technology management and strategy
 
Keywords
Ecosystemsalliancestechnological changestandardscoopetitioncoordination
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
Multilateral Technology Coordination: Departure from Existing Strategy Perspectives 
Antecedents of Multi-firm Technology Coordination Organizations 
Effectiveness of the Multi-firm Technology Coordination Mechanism 
Discussion 
Conclusion 
References 

Abstract

Multi-party technology coordination bodies that bring together hundreds of firms to define the technical rules of interaction between components in a product-system, are an increasingly influential organizational arrangement, as exemplified by the market success of technology standards such as WiFi, Bluetooth, and HDMI. Yet we are limited in our understanding of the antecedents to such coordination, and, conditional on formation of a coordination structure, the factors that enable its success. We propose a conceptual framework that integrates research on alliances, coopetition, and ecosystems, and builds on the tension between value creation and value capture that is specific to the multilateral technology coordination context. Our two-part framework first proposes that the impetus to create value using multi-firm coordination forums is spurred by the modular structure of the ecosystem, the distribution of firms' knowledge and competitive positions within this structure, and the extent to which potential complementarities from coordination are multilateral. We then suggest that the effectiveness of the decisions that emerge from these forums may ultimately be constrained by asymmetries across participating firms, both in terms of their potential for future value capture and their adjustment costs of existing resources and capabilities as a consequence of the proposed rules.

DOI:10.1561/111.00000075

Companion

Strategic Management Review, Volume 6, Issue 1-2 Special Issue on Coopetition
See the other articles that are part of this special issue.