Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy > Vol 5 > Issue 2

Federal Incarceration and Native American Felon Disenfranchisement in the US West

Melissa Rogers, Department of Politics and Policy, Claremont Graduate University, USA, melissa.rogers@cgu.edu , Jean Schroedel, Department of Politics and Policy, Claremont Graduate University, USA, jean.schroedel@cgu.edu , Joseph Dietrich, Department of Political Science, Towson University, USA, jdietrich@towson.edu
 
Suggested Citation
Melissa Rogers, Jean Schroedel and Joseph Dietrich (2024), "Federal Incarceration and Native American Felon Disenfranchisement in the US West", Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy: Vol. 5: No. 2, pp 259-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/113.00000101

Publication Date: 16 Oct 2024
© 2024 M. Rogers, J. Schroedel, and J. Dietrich
 
Subjects
American political development,  Federalism,  Law,  Representation
 
Keywords
Felon disenfranchisementNative Americanscriminal justicetribal lands
 

Share

Download article
In this article:
Introduction 
Felony Disenfranchisement in the West 
The Jurisdictional Jungle 
The Justice Process for Native Americans on Reservations 
Sentencing, Prison to Parole 
Perspectives of Felons 
Conclusions 
References 

Abstract

When Native Americans are arrested for felonies on most reservations, they are under the legal authority of the federal government and federal sentencing laws. They are subject to a convoluted system of jurisdiction in which they are held and tried off-reservation in federal courts. We ask how federal criminal justice policies have contributed to voting disenfranchisement of Native Americans in Western states. We document the role of federal government policies in the sentencing of Native Americans in Western states with felon disenfranchisement laws. We show that the path to disenfranchisement in these states flows through the federal government, which imposes longer sentences than most states for equivalent crimes. Federal felons are not eligible for parole, a key point when voting rights are restored in most states. The jurisdictional challenges, legal ambiguities, and concerns with voting violations strongly discourage Native felons from voting after their sentences.

DOI:10.1561/113.00000101

Online Appendix | 113.00000101_app.pdf

This is the article's accompanying appendix.

DOI: 10.1561/113.00000101_app

Companion

Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, Volume 5, Issue 2 Special Issue: The Political Economy of Native American Policy: Articles Overiew
See the other articles that are part of this special issue.